WHOSYERDAD-E Who's Your Daddy?
Wikigenealogy

Lucy Taillebois, 10701128 (aged 58 years)

Name
Lucy /Taillebois/
Surname
Taillebois
Given names
Lucy
Family with parents
father
mother
herself
10701128
Birth: 1070 34 30 Mercia
Death: 1128
Family with Ives Taillebois
partner
herself
10701128
Birth: 1070 34 30 Mercia
Death: 1128
son
Family with Roger FitzGerold
partner
herself
10701128
Birth: 1070 34 30 Mercia
Death: 1128
son
Family with RanulphIII leMeschines Earl of Chester
husband
10701128
Birth: 1070 20 17 Chester
Death: January 1128Chester, Cheshire, England
herself
10701128
Birth: 1070 34 30 Mercia
Death: 1128
Marriage Marriageabout 1098Normandy, France
3 years
son
-3 years
son
-7 years
daughter
10881128
Birth: 1088 18 18 Hertford, Hertfordshire, England
Death: 1128
Birth
1070 34 30
Death of a maternal grandfather
Birth of a daughter
Death of a father
Birth of a son
Marriage
Birth of a son
Marriage of a daughter
Death of a daughter
Death of a husband
Death
1128 (aged 58 years)
Unique identifier
B7043BAFA66F14468D4F69C7011B68B35756
Last change
23 January 200719:13:57
Note

Notes
Weis' "Ancestral Roots. . ." (125:27), (132A:26), (132D:26), (246B:25).Does not identify her parents.

Baroness Spalding. Cockayne's "Complete Peerage" states that she waswidowed twice (first to Ivo Tallebois, then, secondly, to RogerFitzGerold, to whom she bore William de Roumare, Earl of Lincoln) beforeshe married the Lord of Clare.
Cockayne states that Ivo was her first husband. He states that the nameof Lucy's father does not seem to have been preserved, but that there issatisfactory evidence that her mother was da. of William Mallet.

I have seen her given as a dau. of AELFGAR, Earl of East Anglia. Weis'"Ancestral Roots. . ." (176A:3) acknowledges only one known daughter ofAELFGAR & ELFGIFU - EDITH (RIN 1016).

According to ""A Genalogy of the Southworths (Southards), by Samuel G.Webber (1905) [GC 929.2 So 8766w] avail. at the Allen Co. Lib. in Ft.Wayne, IN : (footnote p. 432) "Lucy was the dau. of Algar III [AELFGAR(RIN 1017)], but modern genealogist reject the claim.